![\"](\"\/\/gabrielezappi.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/02\/it.gif\")
<\/a>Clicca qui per la versione in italiano.<\/a><\/p>\n<\/p>\n
\n
\n\nThere’s a new word entering the language of photography – and its meaning is unclear!<\/h3>\n<\/div>\n\nIt is relatively easy to decide whether or not a lens offers good sharpness.
But how do you define its performance with out-of-focus images ? And does it matter ?
Well, it does to Japanese photographers, and they have a word for it – ‘bokeh’.<\/h4>\n<\/div>\n<\/h3>\n
Bokeh is an approximation of the sound of a Japanese word – there is no equivalent word in English.<\/span>
<\/span><\/p>\nIt refers to the quality of the out-of-focus areas of an image.<\/span><\/div>\n<\/span><\/p>\nYou probably thought that one out-of-focus image was much like another, but it is not. The appearance of the out-of-focus image can be very distinctive, and can add to or detract from the effectiveness of the image.<\/span><\/div>\n<\/p>\nBokeh is big in Japan, where some photo magazines include the results in lens test alongside other performancecriteria. The problem is that bokeh is – at the moment – purely subjective. No one has yet come up with a reliablemethod of measuring the effect, and translating this into a quality index. It is also very difficult to describe in words.<\/div>\nGerman lenses are praised for good bokeh, while many Japanese lenses, even from major manufacturers, are not well regarded. Canon lenses seem to be an exception, and Canon uses good bokeh as a selling point in some of its Japanese adverts. In particular, the EF 35mm f2 and EF 100mm f2.8 have good reputation in this respect.<\/div>\nIt is unlikely that bokeh will ever replace sharpness as the main selling point of a lens, but certainly influences our impression of lens performance.<\/div>\n<\/span><\/p>\n
The theory behind bokeh <\/h4>\n
<\/p>\n
\n![](\"https:\/\/images-blogger-opensocial.googleusercontent.com\/gadgets\/proxy?url=http%3A%2F%2F3.bp.blogspot.com%2F-bRb4D92OyWY%2FUxBlqH4P6_I%2FAAAAAAAB1xk%2FLMvB5Il2M_s%2Fs1600%2Fbokeh1.gif&container=blogger&gadget=a&rewriteMime=image%2F*\")
<\/a><\/p>\n<\/p>\n
Above: To understand bokeh, you need to know how a lens forms an image. In<\/span><\/div>\n<\/span><\/p>\nsimple term, rays of light from a point on an in-focus subject pass through the lens and come together at a point on the film surface. This is repeated for all the other points at the same distance from the lens.<\/span><\/div>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n![](\"https:\/\/images-blogger-opensocial.googleusercontent.com\/gadgets\/proxy?url=http%3A%2F%2F4.bp.blogspot.com%2F-YWxfMC5LoYQ%2FUxBl6Yg1wEI%2FAAAAAAAB1xs%2F3eY2Dr9_tYI%2Fs1600%2Fbokeh2.gif&container=blogger&gadget=a&rewriteMime=image%2F*\")
<\/a>
![](\"https:\/\/images-blogger-opensocial.googleusercontent.com\/gadgets\/proxy?url=http%3A%2F%2F2.bp.blogspot.com%2F-zWvG3bDgQho%2FUxBmDSLdf2I%2FAAAAAAAB1x0%2FS7R-tWpe-aE%2Fs1600%2Fbokeh3.gif&container=blogger&gadget=a&rewriteMime=image%2F*\")
<\/a><\/p>\n![](\"https:\/\/images-blogger-opensocial.googleusercontent.com\/gadgets\/proxy?url=http%3A%2F%2F4.bp.blogspot.com%2F-akU-pXAiN3I%2FUxBmRG3UBkI%2FAAAAAAAB1x8%2Fh1Lu1f2ZFdk%2Fs1600%2Fbokeh4.gif&container=blogger&gadget=a&rewriteMime=image%2F*\")
<\/a>Above: Rays of light from parts of the scene which are not in focus come together at a point in front of or behind the film. When this out-of-focus beam hits the film, it is a small circle (white area on diagram), rather than a point of light.<\/p>\nThat, at least, is the theory. In practice, no lens is perfect and the out-of-focus area is more likely to be an ellipse than a circle (top shape). Alternatively, it may take on some of the characteristics of the lens aperture and be a polygon – possibly with an irregular shape (bottom shape):
<\/span><\/p>\n
Also, the tonal range across the shape may not be even. It can fade towards the edge <\/span>(below left), or the centre (below centre), or from one side to the other (below right): <\/span><\/div>\n<\/div>\n![](\"https:\/\/images-blogger-opensocial.googleusercontent.com\/gadgets\/proxy?url=http%3A%2F%2F2.bp.blogspot.com%2F-jUs7OCCdvOU%2FUxBmbvRA0rI%2FAAAAAAAB1yE%2FO9fb8KXgr88%2Fs1600%2Fbokeh5.gif&container=blogger&gadget=a&rewriteMime=image%2F*\")
<\/a><\/p>\nThe causes of these variations are the usual lens aberrations – coma, spherical <\/span>aberration and chromatic aberration. These aberrations vary within a single lens <\/span>element, and are usually greater towards the edges, so bokeh may also vary <\/span>across the image. In extreme cases, a thin out-of-focus line might even become <\/span>two parallel lines.<\/span><\/div>\n“Good” bokeh seems to come from lenses which produce circular, smooth-toned <\/span>out-of-focus shapes across the film. There is nothing you can do to alter the <\/span>bokeh of an existing lens, though you may find it changes at different aperture <\/span>settings.<\/span><\/div>\n
<\/span><\/div>\n
<\/span><\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Bokeh for beginners (Pubblished in one of my old site, on 1998 – From EOS Magazine – March 1998) Clicca qui per la versione in italiano. There’s a new word entering the language of photography – and its meaning is unclear! It is relatively easy to decide whether or not a lens offers good sharpness.But … Continue reading Bokeh for beginners<\/span>
There’s a new word entering the language of photography – and its meaning is unclear!<\/h3>\n<\/div>\n\nIt is relatively easy to decide whether or not a lens offers good sharpness.
But how do you define its performance with out-of-focus images ? And does it matter ?
Well, it does to Japanese photographers, and they have a word for it – ‘bokeh’.<\/h4>\n<\/div>\n<\/h3>\n
Bokeh is an approximation of the sound of a Japanese word – there is no equivalent word in English.<\/span>
<\/span><\/p>\nIt refers to the quality of the out-of-focus areas of an image.<\/span><\/div>\n<\/span><\/p>\nYou probably thought that one out-of-focus image was much like another, but it is not. The appearance of the out-of-focus image can be very distinctive, and can add to or detract from the effectiveness of the image.<\/span><\/div>\n<\/p>\nBokeh is big in Japan, where some photo magazines include the results in lens test alongside other performancecriteria. The problem is that bokeh is – at the moment – purely subjective. No one has yet come up with a reliablemethod of measuring the effect, and translating this into a quality index. It is also very difficult to describe in words.<\/div>\nGerman lenses are praised for good bokeh, while many Japanese lenses, even from major manufacturers, are not well regarded. Canon lenses seem to be an exception, and Canon uses good bokeh as a selling point in some of its Japanese adverts. In particular, the EF 35mm f2 and EF 100mm f2.8 have good reputation in this respect.<\/div>\nIt is unlikely that bokeh will ever replace sharpness as the main selling point of a lens, but certainly influences our impression of lens performance.<\/div>\n<\/span><\/p>\n
The theory behind bokeh <\/h4>\n
<\/p>\n
\n<\/a><\/p>\n<\/p>\n
Above: To understand bokeh, you need to know how a lens forms an image. In<\/span><\/div>\n<\/span><\/p>\nsimple term, rays of light from a point on an in-focus subject pass through the lens and come together at a point on the film surface. This is repeated for all the other points at the same distance from the lens.<\/span><\/div>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/a>
<\/a><\/p>\n<\/a>Above: Rays of light from parts of the scene which are not in focus come together at a point in front of or behind the film. When this out-of-focus beam hits the film, it is a small circle (white area on diagram), rather than a point of light.<\/p>\nThat, at least, is the theory. In practice, no lens is perfect and the out-of-focus area is more likely to be an ellipse than a circle (top shape). Alternatively, it may take on some of the characteristics of the lens aperture and be a polygon – possibly with an irregular shape (bottom shape):
<\/span><\/p>\n
Also, the tonal range across the shape may not be even. It can fade towards the edge <\/span>(below left), or the centre (below centre), or from one side to the other (below right): <\/span><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/a><\/p>\nThe causes of these variations are the usual lens aberrations – coma, spherical <\/span>aberration and chromatic aberration. These aberrations vary within a single lens <\/span>element, and are usually greater towards the edges, so bokeh may also vary <\/span>across the image. In extreme cases, a thin out-of-focus line might even become <\/span>two parallel lines.<\/span><\/div>\n“Good” bokeh seems to come from lenses which produce circular, smooth-toned <\/span>out-of-focus shapes across the film. There is nothing you can do to alter the <\/span>bokeh of an existing lens, though you may find it changes at different aperture <\/span>settings.<\/span><\/div>\n
<\/span><\/div>\n
<\/span><\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Bokeh for beginners (Pubblished in one of my old site, on 1998 – From EOS Magazine – March 1998) Clicca qui per la versione in italiano. There’s a new word entering the language of photography – and its meaning is unclear! It is relatively easy to decide whether or not a lens offers good sharpness.But … Continue reading Bokeh for beginners<\/span>
It is relatively easy to decide whether or not a lens offers good sharpness.
But how do you define its performance with out-of-focus images ? And does it matter ?
Well, it does to Japanese photographers, and they have a word for it – ‘bokeh’.<\/h4>\n<\/div>\n<\/h3>\n
Bokeh is an approximation of the sound of a Japanese word – there is no equivalent word in English.<\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n <\/p>\n <\/span><\/p>\n <\/p>\n <\/p>\n <\/span><\/p>\n <\/span><\/p>\n That, at least, is the theory. In practice, no lens is perfect and the out-of-focus area is more likely to be an ellipse than a circle (top shape). Alternatively, it may take on some of the characteristics of the lens aperture and be a polygon – possibly with an irregular shape (bottom shape): Bokeh for beginners (Pubblished in one of my old site, on 1998 – From EOS Magazine – March 1998) Clicca qui per la versione in italiano. There’s a new word entering the language of photography – and its meaning is unclear! It is relatively easy to decide whether or not a lens offers good sharpness.But … Continue reading Bokeh for beginners<\/span>
<\/span><\/p>\nThe theory behind bokeh <\/h4>\n
\n<\/a><\/p>\n<\/a><\/a><\/p>\n<\/a>Above: Rays of light from parts of the scene which are not in focus come together at a point in front of or behind the film. When this out-of-focus beam hits the film, it is a small circle (white area on diagram), rather than a point of light.<\/p>\n
<\/span><\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n
<\/span><\/div>\n
<\/span><\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"